Grown builder
Zero to Builder report
| When | Lead stage | Density | One-line character |
| 2026-06-05 | 4 · Orchestrator | 0.35 | Directs a dual-agent (Claude+Codex) workflow · routes artifacts |
| 2026-06-12 | 4 · Orchestrator | 0.45 | Decides direction (Tauri) with rationale + assigns R&R directly + challenges design via reference cases |
| 2026-06-22 | 4 · Orchestrator | 0.48 | Directs 'design through discussion' + requests recursive checks on their own |
| 2026-06-25 | 4~5 boundary | 0.55 | Designs the technical strategy themselves + structural critique of artifact quality + foresees the long-term migration path of a stopgap |
| 2026-07-02 | 5 · Human agent | 0.62 | Directs interrogation of a feature's essence by user value/PAIN + articulates the domain purpose-chain·user journey directly |
| 2026-07-03 | 4~5 boundary | 0.55 | Independently challenges whether an implementation is real vs mocked + internalizes recursive checks every session |
Trend Deepened from orchestration·relay-centric early on into a driven, self-evolving flow — articulating the domain model directly, challenging whether implementations are real, and running recursive checks on their own.
Current lead stage Stage 4 ~ 5 boundary (Orchestrator → Human agent)
To level up You already challenge, back-solve, and self-evolve. What's left is raising how often you refute·redefine the AI's proposed direction itself against root/the three chains — that reaches the fully-peer stage.